<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;Dynamite plots: unmitigated evil?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://emdbolker.wikidot.com/blog:dynamite/comments/show</link>
		<description></description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://emdbolker.wikidot.com/blog:dynamite/comments/show#post-457445</guid>
				<title>Beanplots</title>
				<link>http://emdbolker.wikidot.com/blog:dynamite/comments/show#post-457445</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Trevor</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Ben,</p> <p>Excellent book. Thank you for publishing it.</p> <p>An alternative to above is the beanplot which I have found useful for comparing posteriors from Bayesian analyses. They are similar to the raindrop plots described by Barrowman and Myers (2001) but is contained in a nice R-package. I prefer them to violin or box plots since bimodality can be hidden with those approaches.</p> <p><a href="http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/beanplot/index.html">http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/beanplot/index.html</a></p> <p>I hope you find this useful to the debate.<br /> Cheers,<br /> Trevor</p> <p>Barrowman, N.J. and R.A. Myers. A new graphical display for meta-analysis: the Raindrop Plot. Am. Stat.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>